LUSTIFY! [SDXL NSFW & SFW checkpoint]

https://civitai.com/models/573152/lustify-sdxl-nsfw-and-sfw-checkpoint?modelVersionId=708635

UPD 09.08: V2 is out. What new:

1. I've trained the model for additional ~26 535 steps on a completely new set of pictures.
2. Better style variety, way better natural language prompt understanding, better prompt adherence, better SFW.
3. BUT! Hardcore scenes are now less consistent (you can still get them right, but it will take more rerolls). I wanted to fix that, but honestly I got too exhausted from working on V2. Sorry guys, probably not the update you expected, but it's definitely the update the checkpoint needs. You can counter this by using some NSFW lora with a very low weight.

LUSTIFY!

A photoreal checkpoint, capable of creating decent porn scenes without any loras (although, with just a little help of your favourite NSFW concept lora it can get even more consistent). But that's not the only use - it can also create gorgeous SFW pics of objects/animals/fantasy creatures/you name it (you'll have to convince it tho - the model is horny).

"LUSTIFY!" understands both danbooru tags and natural language prompting, because it was trained like that. For V1 (not needed for V2) I recomend putting "score_9" tag into the begining of your prompt. Yes, the tag from the pony models. Yes, I am sure.

A couple of things I need to make clear before you download the checkpoint:

1. All of my stuff is very opinionated. I create models mostly to suit my needs, my workflows, my prompting, etc.
2. Sometimes you can get bad hands and bad faces at distant shots. These are hard to fix with finetuning, but really easy with inpainting/adetailer. So, please, don't bother me with the complaints about this. Either adapt to the needs of this checkpoint, or use something else (spoiler, 99% of checkpoints suffer from that because of the limitations of this tech).
3. Everything I do is experimental, and I do a lot of dumb-crazy stuff that in theory shouldn't work. So it's to be expected that something, what used to work with other checkpoint for you, might not work with this one. Let me know if there are such things, and I'd see if I can do something about it.

Recomended parameters: Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE, Scheduler: Exponential/Karras Steps: 30 Cfg: 4-7. Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4 For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.

Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizo prompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model).

FAQ:

1. Q: Output is broken is Fooocus. A: Turn off "Fooocus Enhance" style.

Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:

Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".

Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography".

Lighting types: cinematic lighting, "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".

Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".

Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.

Others: "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed".

Alternatively, you can give a read to this wonderful prompting guide by PromptGeek. It has A LOT of useful tips I didn't know about even after 2 years of using SD.

Work In progress: Initially it started out as a mix of my personal unreleased SDXL finetune with such wonderful checkpoints as bigASP and Pyro's NSFW. Then I've finetuned this mix on a curated dataset of 1000 pics for aesthetic tweak. The recipe was something like: 0.55*(my unreleased SDXL finetune)+0.45*(0.5*(bigASP)+0.5*(Pyro's NSFW)). For V2 I've merged V1 with NatVis (20%) and then trained on new 1700 pics for additional 26 535 steps.