半透明系最後斜め向き視点寝そべりながらの背後位先までのモデルでも記載した通り、半透明表現はAnima側の方がイラストリアス版側より安定感があるためAnimaに対しては補助誘導型のLoRAとなるポーズ変化は半透明の重なりも意識すると成功率が低めになるのとILとAnimaで得意不得意が分かれるまぁ学習画像に入れてないので当たり前といえば当たり前だがアニメ画風■推奨適用強度IL：0.8-Anima：0.4- 画風適用が0.5-辺りからとなる。半透明を崩す金ないためAdetailerは使いにくい■利用タグhug を使った場合、気持ち抱きしめ密着の体勢となる。hug を入れないと半透明男性が体を起こしてるか少し背を曲げた形で出る感じとなりやすい。イラストリアス版側で hug を入れた場合、女性の向きがひっくり返ったりの構図ずれをそれなりに発生させてしまう（高強度利用時除く）■その他構図ずれを起こしやすかったり等、イラストリアス版側は描写安定性に少し欠ける（1.0等の高強度利用時除く）Anima版の方が描写安定性が高いLast of the semi-transparent seriesPose: Lying down, viewed from an angle, positioned behind the subject.As noted with the previous model, the semi-transparent effect is more stable in the Anima version than in the Illustrious version;therefore, for Anima, this functions as an auxiliary guidance LoRA.Attempting to vary the pose while accounting for the overlapping semi-transparent layers tends to lower the success rate, and the strengths/weaknesses differ between the Illustrious and Anima versions.(Well, this is to be expected since such poses weren't included in the training data.)Anime art style.■ Recommended StrengthIL: 0.8+Anima: 0.4+ (Art style application kicks in around 0.5).ADetailer is difficult to use because it tends to break the semi-transparent effect.■ TagsUsing "hug" results in a pose where they are closely embracing.Without "hug," the semi-transparent male tends to appear sitting up or slightly hunched over.In the Illustrious version, using "hug" often causes compositional errors, such as the female character flipping orientation (except when using high strength).■ OtherThe Illustrious version lacks some stability in rendering and is prone to compositional errors (except at high strengths like 1.0).The Anima version offers better rendering stability.
