PixAI 會員
PixAI
PixAI
Generate
Sign in
主頁
生成
模型
Studio
NEW
比賽
用 Mio.2 創作
AI 工具
NEW
指南

用戶LoRA

DiT.2DiT.1XLSD
服飾

Winter Cap With Flaps (Exploration of LoRAs)

#帽子#冬裝

創作

  • AI 圖像生成器
  • AI 動畫生成器
  • AI 工具
  • 藝術主題產生器
  • 訓練 LoRA
  • Mio.2 智慧助手
  • Studio

探索

  • 熱門 Tags
  • 排名
  • 模型市場
  • 比賽
  • 新聞

關於

  • 指南
  • PixAI 部落格
  • Tsubaki.2
  • 認識 Mio,我們的吉祥物
  • 內容規則

定價與說明

  • 會員計劃
  • 購買點數
  • 聯絡

移動端 APP

  • 下載 PixAI App
  • App Store
  • Google Play
© 2026 PixAI
  • 服務條款
  • 隱私政策
  • 版權政策
  • 第三方內容聲明
  • 特定商業交易法
Winter Cap With Flaps (Exploration of LoRAs) - AI Model cover image
訓練者
Avatar image of Bag Swell

Bag Swell

訓練你自己的 LoRA
上傳時間
2026年8月3日 清晨5:22
使用數
106
返利
7,465
評論
非常好  (1)
觸發詞

black hat, hat brim, wool hat, hat flaps down

許可權
  • 允許圖片生成與分享
  • 允許使用者下載此模型
  • 允許生成圖片用於商業用途

描述

Trained on 10 images.

SD:

Anything V5 and Moonbeam are both popular AI checkpoint models used on platforms like PixAI and Stable Diffusion for generating 2D anime-style illustrations. While both excel at high "anime plasticity" and clean character designs, they differ slightly in their default aesthetic, line work, and color shading.

  • Core Differences:

Anything V5:

  • Focuses on crisp, highly versatile, classic anime and cel-shaded aesthetics.
  • Adheres strictly to a wide range of standard prompts, making it a reliable, all-around benchmark model for general anime characters, poses, and detailed outfits.

Moonbeam:

  • Tends to lean toward a softer, slightly more atmospheric, and luminous rendering style.
  • Often preferred for specific fantasy, glowing, or ethereal lighting effects on characters, blending smoothly with specialized anime LoRA styles.

SDXL:

Haruka V2 is a specialized, in-house fine-tuned anime model created by PixAI, while Illustrious (Illustrious XL) is a broader, foundational base model architecture designed for general high-detail anime generation. In fact, Haruka V2 is built upon the Illustrious ecosystem, meaning they share underlying compatibility while serving different creative goals.

Core Differences:

Haruka V2 (PixAI Fine-tune):

  • Aesthetic: Focuses on soft pastel tones, smooth clothing textures, and vibrant hair shine.

  • Details: Highly optimized for expressive facial features, detailed eye highlights, and cleaner hand structures.

  • Use Case: Best for clean, polished, expressive individual character portraits straight out of the box on PixAI.

Illustrious (Base Model Family):

  • Aesthetic: Highly versatile and adaptable across a vast spectrum of different anime art styles.

  • Recognition: Built with broad data to natively recognize and render a massive library of popular pre-existing anime characters.

  • Use Case: Acts as a general foundation model used by creators to generate diverse styles or to train custom LoRAs.

DiT:

SD and SDXL LoRAs allow weights up to 2.0 because their older UNet architectures require higher scaling to overcome base model traits. While DiT.1 (diffusion transformer) models have much higher prompt adherence and structural sensitivity, meaning weights above 1.2 quickly break anatomy and distort the image.

Architecture Differences

  • SD / SDXL (UNet): Built on older convolutional layouts that often require pushing a LoRA past 1.0 to forcefully express specific styles or clothing details.

  • DiT.1 (Transformer): Uses a transformer-based backbone that responds aggressively to parameter changes. Higher weights over-correct the internal attention blocks rapidly.

Sensitivity and Limits

  • SD/SDXL Range (0.0 to 2.0): Gives leeway to boost weak or undercooked community-trained files, though values past 1.4 often introduce deep-fried artifacts.

  • DiT.1 Range (0.0 to 1.2): Capped lower by platform constraints because the transformer network saturates fast; a weight of 1.0 on a DiT LoRA acts like a 1.5+ strength on SDXL.

DiT.1 & DiT.2:

On PixAI, DiT.1 and DiT.2 represent different generations of Diffusion Transformer model architectures and training bases. DiT.1 uses the original Tsubaki base model, while DiT.2 uses the advanced Tsubaki.2 architecture, which yields higher quality, better multi-character composition, and deeper prompt comprehension.

  • Core Differences

Base Models: DiT.1 trains against Tsubaki, whereas DiT.2 trains against Tsubaki.2.

Output Quality: DiT.2 produces sharper details, better lighting, and cleaner overall rendering than DiT.1.

Training Time: DiT.1 (Tsubaki) jobs finish in about 70 minutes, while DiT.2 jobs take roughly 2 hours.

Trigger Word Rules:

  • DiT.1: Uses concise, short names or tags.

  • DiT.2: Requires a detailed feature description of at least 30 characters (reading like a mini inventory of attributes rather than a single name).

評論