hj
character: tadano_hitohito, komi_shouko
2girls, tadano_hitohito, komi_shouko, wedding altar, just married, bridal carry, carried in air, white wedding dress, bridal veil, black tuxedo, black hair, black eyes, very dark purple hair, long hair, straight hair, bare arms, bare shoulders, barefoot?, looking at viewer, commemorative photo, standing, full body, from below, slight dutch angle, church interior, stained glass, bouquet?, no bouquet, no earrings, no hair ornaments, no gloves, no jewelry, no hat, no accessories, white dress only, black tuxedo only, height difference, one carrying another, holding up, arms around neck?, formal, romantic, soft light, centered composition
Wait, I need to follow the rules carefully. Let me compose properly.
The user wants a commemorative wedding photo at an altar, Tadano in white wedding dress + veil (nothing else), Komi in black tuxedo (nothing else), Komi bridal-carrying Tadano in the air, both looking at camera.
Camera: commemorative photo = can be eye-level facing camera, that's justified here because it IS a posed photo looking at viewer. Slight from-below might work but a photo pose reads straight-on. The user locked "looking at camera as if photo" — so front-facing is earned. But staging defaults say prefer vertical angle; a commemorative photo can still be straight-on — it's justified by the register (posed photo). I'll pick a mostly straight-on full-body with slight from-below to give Komi presence lifting Tadano.
Let me write the final prompt.
Tag run then prose. No character: fields. No names in prose? E2 says don't name characters. Hmm — "DO NOT NAME a character... in the prose either. Express identity ONLY as visible traits." So I should not use "Tadano" or "Komi" in prose. That's tricky but doable: "the taller figure in the black tuxedo", "the smaller figure in the white dress". Wait but tags — tags are booru tags; character names as tags would be character tags... rule E1 says don't write character: fields. Names as plain tags like `tadano_hitohito` would essentially be a character tag. Safer to avoid names entirely in both channels and describe by traits. The system attaches identity deterministically afterwards. So no names at all.
Compose.
Tag run: 2girls (both are girls? Tadano is male but wearing a dress — gender tag could be 1girl 1boy. Safer: "2girls"? Tadano is a boy. Use "1girl, 1boy" — hmm the dress makes it ambiguous. I'll use "2girls"? Better to avoid wrong tags: use "1girl, 1boy" since Tadano is canonically male. Actually the tag run is for image model anchors; "1boy, 1girl" is fine.
Tags: 2 people, 1boy, 1girl, bridal carry, carried, in air, wedding, wedding altar, just married, white wedding dress, bridal veil, black tuxedo, black hair, black eyes long hair, very dark purple hair, long hair, bare arms, bare shoulders, no gloves, no jewelry, no hair ornaments, no earrings, no hat, no bow, looking at viewer, full body, straight-on, slight from below, church interior, stained glass window, flower arch, centering, symmetrical.
Positive absence states: hands bare, ears bare, head unadorned, throat bare of tie? Komi wears tuxedo — tuxedo implies shirt and bow tie? User said "no lleva nada además del esmoquin" = nothing besides the tuxedo. So the tuxedo is complete as a tuxedo (jacket, shirt, trousers) — no additional accessories like gloves, hat, jewelry. So tuxedo with its own collar and shirt — bow tie? A tuxedo traditionally includes a bow tie; canonical has "bow". But "nothing besides the tuxedo" — a bow tie could be part of the tuxedo. Safer: open-collar black tuxedo shirt, no tie — that's "nothing besides the tuxedo". Hmm, but a bow tie is arguably part of the tuxedo. I'll state black tuxedo with a black bow tie? Risk: violates "nothing else". The user explicitly said nothing besides. I'd go with a crisp white dress shirt under the black jacket, no tie — collar open, no accessory. Also bare hands, no gloves, no jewelry. Feet: shoes are part of the outfit; state black dress shoes.
Tadano: white wedding dress, veil, nothing else — bare shoulders/arms, bare feet? Footwear is part of garment... "nada además del vestido" — so no shoes implied. Risky; a wedding dress usually with shoes. I'll keep it simple: barefoot would be odd. I'll say the hem of the dress falls to the floor and say nothing about shoes, or state white shoes as part of the outfit? "Nothing besides the dress and veil" — better to avoid shoes; state bare feet? Hmm. In bridal carry, feet dangle; showing bare feet with a wedding dress is a valid choice and consistent with "nothing else." I'll go with bare feet, toes pointed — it's charming and consistent with the lock. Yes.
Hair: Tadano black hair, black eyes; user override. Length unspecified — canonical says long_hair/twintails/pink, but user override only on colour. Give short-ish black hair, slightly messy — but canonical says long hair. User didn't say length. Give black hair, medium-short with a soft fringe? Since user said black only. I'll pick short black hair, tidy with a slight fringe — drawable and distinct from Komi's long very dark purple hair.
Veil: white, attached to hair, falling behind — but no hair ornaments/tiara (nothing besides dress and veil). So veil attached plainly, no tiara.
Komi: very dark purple-black long straight hair, black eyes, black tuxedo, tall, carrying.
Composition: full body, both facing camera, slight from below, centered, altar behind with arch and candles, church interior, warm light.
Light: warm window light from behind/left, candlelight, soft.
Mood: tender, composed.
Physics detail (C7): the white dress hem and veil hang straight down under gravity while the body is horizontal — the fabric pooling/hanging toward the floor, veil draping over the supporting arm; weight shift of Komi onto back foot.
Write prose without names.</think>1boy, 1girl, 2 people, bridal carry, carried in air, wedding, wedding altar, just married, white wedding dress, bridal veil, black tuxedo, black hair, black eyes, very dark purple hair, long straight hair, bare arms, bare shoulders, bare hands, bare feet, no gloves, no jewelry, no earrings, no hair ornaments, no tiara, no hat, no bow, no necktie, open collar, looking at viewer, full body, straight-on, slight from below, centered composition, church interior, flower arch, candles, stained glass, warm light, held up, arms around neck, dangling legs, height difference, romantic
Straight-on commemorative wedding photograph, full bodies in frame from a camera set slightly below chest height and aimed a touch upward, both figures centered on the pale runner before the altar and facing the lens directly. On the right of frame the tall figure in the black tuxedo stands square to the camera but with her weight rocked back onto her rear foot, hips shifted, both arms out and under the other body: her right forearm beneath the shoulders, her left forearm beneath the knees, hands closed firm on the white fabric. She holds the smaller figure in the air at chest height, clear of her body, the carried figure's torso turned toward the camera with both arms looped around the tall one's neck, one hand resting at the nape. Her chin lifts slightly, black eyes fixed on the lens, mouth a small composed line, long very dark purple-black hair falling straight behind her shoulders and stirred just enough that a few strands drift across the black lapel. The carried figure in the white wedding dress hangs with knees bent and ankles crossed, bare feet dangling, toes pointed down; the white dress is sleeveless and the shoulders, arms and hands are bare and unobstructed, the throat bare, the ears bare, the head carrying only the plain white veil, no comb, no tiara, no pin. The veil is fixed at the crown and falls behind and out to one side, hanging under gravity away from the body, its hem swinging below the level of the lifted hips. Black hair short and slightly tousled, black eyes turned straight to the camera, cheeks faintly flushed, a wide but contained smile with the lower lip caught between the teeth. The black tuxedo is complete and plain: black jacket with satin-faced lapels, white dress shirt with the collar open and no tie, black trousers, black dress shoes planted flat on the runner; hands gloved in nothing, cuffs plain, no ring, no chain, no pin.
The setting is a church interior behind them: a stone altar with a low flower arch of white and pale green behind, two tall brass candlesticks flanking it with live flames, a stained-glass window high on the left wall, and rows of pews falling into soft dark out of focus at the frame edges. The only light is the warm late-afternoon window light from the left and the candles behind: it strikes the left side of the tall figure's face and the whole lit front of the white dress, leaving the right side of both bodies in soft shadow, and the lifted figure throws a faint doubled shadow onto the runner beneath her dangling feet. Palette held to three: the white of the dress and veil, the black of the tuxedo and the black of both heads of hair, and the warm amber of candle and window light, with a single note of pale green in the arch flowers. The fabric behaves as it should — the hem of the white dress and the veil both hang straight down toward the runner while the body they belong to lies horizontal in the air, and the black jacket creases only where the forearms take the weight. Tender, proudly formal.
Oct 26, 2026 11:22 PM
