LUSTIFY! [SDXL NSFW & SFW checkpoint]

UPD 29.09: V3 is out. What's new: 1) It's good at hardcore porn (doggystyle, cowgirl) again. 2) The visuals are darker and have more contrast compared to V1 / V2. 3) Also, I've noticed people wanted to create more 'amateur' looking stuff, so I've added some low quality pics into the dataset. Use "lowres, low quality, candid photo, amateur" tags in your positive prompt.V1 - Good at porn, "meh" at everything else.V2 - Good at softcore/aesthetic NSFW and SFW, mediocre at hardcore.V3 - Tries to combine the strengths of V1 and V2, yet brings something new to the table.LUSTIFY! A photoreal checkpoint, capable of creating decent porn scenes without any loras (although, with just a little help of your favourite NSFW concept lora it can get even more consistent). It understands both danbooru tags and natural language prompting, because it was trained like that. But that's not the only use - it can also create gorgeous SFW pics of objects/animals/fantasy creatures/you name it (you'll have to convince it tho - the model is horny). A couple of things I need to make clear before you download the checkpoint:1) All of my stuff is very opinionated. I create models mostly to suit my needs, my workflows, my prompting, etc. 2) Sometimes you can get bad hands and bad faces at distant shots. These are hard to fix with finetuning, but really easy with inpainting/adetailer. So, please, don't bother me with the complaints about this. Either adapt to the needs of this checkpoint, or use something else (spoiler, 99% of checkpoints suffer from that because of the limitations of this tech).3) Everything I do is experimental, and I do a lot of dumb-crazy stuff that in theory shouldn't work. So it's to be expected that something, what used to work with other checkpoint for you, might not work with this one. Let me know if there are such things, and I'd see if I can do something about it.Recomended parameters:Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE, Scheduler: Exponential/KarrasSteps: 30Cfg: 2.5-7.Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizo prompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model).FAQ:Q: "Output is broken is Fooocus". A: Turn off "Fooocus Enhance" style.Q: "It can't do men". A: It can, it's just your prompt is probably bad and effortless.Q: "You sound rude and toxic". A: I promise you I'm not. Communicating over the internet doesn't properly convey emotions. Also, I'm just fed up with people doing dumb stuff and blaming me for that. That's why everything you see here is more like a "statement" than a "suggestion".Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography".Lighting types: cinematic lighting, "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.Others: "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed".Alternatively, you can give a read to this wonderful prompting guide by PromptGeek. It has A LOT of useful tips I didn't know about even after 2 years of using SD.Work In progress:Initially it started out as a mix of my personal unreleased SDXL finetune with such wonderful checkpoints as bigASP and Pyro's NSFW. Then I've finetuned this mix on a curated dataset of 1000 pics for aesthetic tweak.The recipe was something like: 0.55*(my unreleased SDXL finetune)+0.45*(0.5*(bigASP)+0.5*(Pyro's NSFW)). For V2 I've merged V1 with NatVis (20%) and then trained on new 1700 pics for additional 26 535 steps.